Osvaldo Nery Representações

Tamsin Greenway ponders the merit in implementing any of the Fast5 rules into netball

At the second portion of this weeks column, Tamsin Greenway ponders about the virtues (or not) of executing some of the Fast5 rules into the complete arrangement of netball…
There was a survey in Australia regarding what rules people would like to see changed from the seven-a-side game.
As the sport continues to drive forwards, rule changes to make itTV commercial or bring about a wider audience will always be considered
Bearing this in mind, and following the epic Fast5 All-Stars Championships in the Copper Box last weekend, I wished to have a take a look at some of the rules that could be thought about or implemented in the match that was seven-a-side and that were thrown around.
I believe the shooting one is quite intriguing… and probably gets the maximum amount of uproar when suggesting a shift.
I definitely would not want to see long-bombs concerning shooting from outside of the circle at a match. But, I am intrigued about how you could split the circle into areas that were two-point and one-point.
I am not saying that it needs to shift in the league but weve created a game at which weve got big, tall shooters and unless youre close to being 6ft tall or 48, its becoming harder to play at the ring.
There are still a few [shorter] GAs floating about but that which selectors are considering, and what kids know, is that you will need to have tall shooters with near post percentages that are shooting to make it. We went through the years of changing every GA that was short !
I think that I think that we are making that a issue with kids than embracing the fact that if you can shoot extended and because of this we also have produced a fear of shooting at long distance , then you should.
When I put it out on Twitter a number of the fans were stating that theyd trialled it that people simply passed it in and out and making a mockery of the match.
But, I feel that just backs up my point. Most players dont shoot from distance and Australia, along with others, are a key leader in this shift in the game. New Zealand won a World Cup on shooting 17, whereas we can not forget that.
The question is would it assist be able to perform with 60 minutes there and to get extra time on court? Can it change team selection and tactics?
Splitting the circle into one and two points would definitely change the dynamic of the defence because if shooters are going out of distance, the way you win ball unexpectedly becomes quite different. It would alter the functions of the shooting circle.
With one and two point shots games in Superleague, could it also help? Look at a group such as Storm who finished – will Sophie Hankin shooting being in a position to rally have shifted results and matches if these things were made into two?
This is the reason why I do not think that we need to take it. I understand there are a good deal of traditionalists out there and that I get I really like our game as it is but I think that the sport has changed massively in the last couple of decades. I dont see that theres any reason why it explored some more to see whether it has a place to help enhance and not hinder or could not be looked at.
Im not a fan of subs. A whole lot of people may say that it is the easiest one to alter and impact is brought by it and they dont mind it.
Primarily I am not entirely against it, like I do think we do need to eliminate the dodgy timeouts – because honestly the imitation injuries are very easy to spot, however I cant get my head around unlimited rolling subs. If there was a limitation to them or there has been a move towards the tactical timeout which Suncorp has introduced then I would be keen.
My issues stem from both a coachs and participants standpoint. As a participant, in certain places it is not always that simple to go make a direct impact in five or six minutes in per year. Therefore, unless you are having a complete shocker, as a player you need to have the ability to work out things and be given the time to do so.
I also think it could very easily turn into a justification for a lack of training. It is a really simple cop-out when a participant is not really doing what you only want to roll on another sub, try something fresh. Therell be times this must happen but then this would not be a continuous, if youve completed your homework.
I liked also to trust that player and to give players the chance in things. I think we must appear at how this filters from elite level and when the sole answer ever would be to simply keep trying out new players we might get rid of the essence of what playing and coaching is about.
I adore the Power Play its amazing, but I dont think it has a place in the normal game. Its that easy in my book.
Together with Centre Passes well, I really dont think you ought to be provided an additional lifeline. Shooting from space requires implementation and skill, being given double things or the ball to help get excitement or games only takes it a lot.
Your Centre Pass ought to be equally as strong as your Centre Pass that is attacking. You must have structures and strategic elements that imply that you can win ball off teams no matter, so I truly dont believe you should be provided a lifeline because you are losing. Thats a part of sport – that you win you lose.
A key part of netball is its what you decide to do with it and that you have the chunk 50 per cent of their time. I think that there are ways to secure games and I do not think that this is one of these.

Read more here: http://osvaldonery.com/?p=27733